. . . . . . . . ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
DC_collector wrote: > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why > does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? > All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in > some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If > they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath > the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
Did it have nipples on it?
If not, they they can do just about anything and I'll be happy. I'm still trying to forget that gawd-awful Clooney film.
But you're right. Interesting how an ultra-low-budget fan film can have a better looking costume than a $100+ million dollar feature. Granted the fan films didn't do the close ups that the feature film does, but still.
> . > . > . > . > . > . > . > . > ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why > does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? > All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in > some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If > they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath > the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
But if he is supposed to hide in the shadows and strike fear in the hearts of men, he really should be dressed all in black
<jns...@aol.com> wrote: >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >. >... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why >does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? >All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in >some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If >they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath >the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
>Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits so far this is the best.
Bob Hughes
"I am perpetually awaiting a rebirth of wonder." Lawrence Ferlinghetti
Bob Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT), DC_collector > <jns...@aol.com> wrote:
>> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> . >> ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why >> does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? >> All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in >> some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If >> they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath >> the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
>> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
> Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits so > far this is the best.
> Bob Hughes
The suit also visually explains why Batman survives being shot by Harvey Dent, and why when they fall off the bridge Harvey dies but Batman lives. And I do like the sharp things that fly off at a touch.
> Bob Hughes wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT), DC_collector >> <jns...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. >>> Why does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic >>> outfits? All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is >>> depicted in some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's >>> Finest, etc.). If they insist on having body armor, they can say >>> that it is underneath the cloth. What do the rest of you think >>> about Batman's movie duds?
>>> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
>> Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits so >> far this is the best.
> The suit also visually explains why Batman survives being shot by > Harvey Dent, and why when they fall off the bridge Harvey dies but > Batman lives. And I do like the sharp things that fly off at a touch.
I just looked at the Watchmen promo poster and decided that I'm tired of the Hollywood interpretation of *all* the comic book costumes. Except for Silk Spectre's costume they all look the same, and hers has nothing in common with the one from the comic. which was just lingerie.
>> Bob Hughes wrote: >>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT), DC_collector >>> <jns...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. >>>> Why does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic >>>> outfits? All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is >>>> depicted in some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's >>>> Finest, etc.). If they insist on having body armor, they can say >>>> that it is underneath the cloth. What do the rest of you think >>>> about Batman's movie duds?
>>>> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture. >>> Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits so >>> far this is the best. >> The suit also visually explains why Batman survives being shot by >> Harvey Dent, and why when they fall off the bridge Harvey dies but >> Batman lives. And I do like the sharp things that fly off at a touch.
> I just looked at the Watchmen promo poster and decided that I'm tired of > the Hollywood interpretation of *all* the comic book costumes. Except > for Silk Spectre's costume they all look the same, and hers has nothing > in common with the one from the comic. which was just lingerie.
They seem to have lost the idea of age -- of Nite Owl as plump and balding, or the Comedian with gray in his hair. (I wonder if he is still the father of Laurie.)
>>> Bob Hughes wrote: >>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT), DC_collector >>>> <jns...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>> ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. >>>>> Why does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic >>>>> outfits? All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume >>>>> is depicted in some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's >>>>> Finest, etc.). If they insist on having body armor, they can say >>>>> that it is underneath the cloth. What do the rest of you think >>>>> about Batman's movie duds?
>>>>> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture. >>>> Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits >>>> so far this is the best. >>> The suit also visually explains why Batman survives being shot by >>> Harvey Dent, and why when they fall off the bridge Harvey dies but >>> Batman lives. And I do like the sharp things that fly off at a >>> touch.
>> I just looked at the Watchmen promo poster and decided that I'm tired >> of the Hollywood interpretation of *all* the comic book costumes. >> Except for Silk Spectre's costume they all look the same, and hers >> has nothing in common with the one from the comic. which was just >> lingerie.
> They seem to have lost the idea of age -- of Nite Owl as plump and > balding, or the Comedian with gray in his hair. (I wonder if he is > still the father of Laurie.)
Of course he is, and you should post a spoiler alert before you say something like that.
>>> I just looked at the Watchmen promo poster and decided that I'm tired >>> of the Hollywood interpretation of *all* the comic book costumes. >>> Except for Silk Spectre's costume they all look the same, and hers >>> has nothing in common with the one from the comic. which was just >>> lingerie.
>> They seem to have lost the idea of age -- of Nite Owl as plump and >> balding, or the Comedian with gray in his hair. (I wonder if he is >> still the father of Laurie.)
> Of course he is, and you should post a spoiler alert before you say > something like that.
ummm, spoiler alert for a twenty year old comic? just asking...
-- Cheers, Arian "God gave Eros poison to drink, he did not die of it to be sure, but degenerated into vice." Nietzsche
> Bob Hughes wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT), DC_collector > > <jns...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> . > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> . > >> ... Batman's black rubber suit and cowl. It just looks ridiculous. Why > >> does Warner Brothers insist on dressing him in these plastic outfits? > >> All they have to do is look at the way Batman's costume is depicted in > >> some of the fan-pics (Batman vs Terminator, World's Finest, etc.). If > >> they insist on having body armor, they can say that it is underneath > >> the cloth. What do the rest of you think about Batman's movie duds?
> >> Otherwise, I really enjoyed the picture.
> > Technically, you're right. But of all the plastic Batman outfits so > > far this is the best.
> > Bob Hughes
> The suit also visually explains why Batman survives being shot by Harvey > Dent, and why when they fall off the bridge Harvey dies but Batman > lives. And I do like the sharp things that fly off at a touch.
Arian wrote: >>>> I just looked at the Watchmen promo poster and decided that I'm tired >>>> of the Hollywood interpretation of *all* the comic book costumes. >>>> Except for Silk Spectre's costume they all look the same, and hers >>>> has nothing in common with the one from the comic. which was just >>>> lingerie. >>> They seem to have lost the idea of age -- of Nite Owl as plump and >>> balding, or the Comedian with gray in his hair. (I wonder if he is >>> still the father of Laurie.) >> Of course he is, and you should post a spoiler alert before you say >> something like that.
> ummm, spoiler alert for a twenty year old comic? just asking...
Or, for a movie that is not out yet and of which nobody can say what major surgery has been done on the plot?
