Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  11 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
Akhil Jain  
View profile
 More options Jul 18, 4:40 am
From: "Akhil Jain" <akhiljai...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:10:39 +0530
Local: Fri, Jul 18 2008 4:40 am
Subject: Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

Ans. Nuclear Agreement between India - USA :MUST READ BY EVERY INDIAN

There are lot of talks about 1 2 3 Agreement between India & USA and it
almost led to the topple of Central Government. In this mail I am trying

to explain the commercial & technical aspects relating to this Agreement
which I have read and sharing with you.

What is 123 Agreement?

This is called 123 Agreement because this comes under USA's Atomic Power
Act Section 123.
Let's see how India's (Indians?) Sovereinty & Independence are
pledged...

(1) After this Agreement USA will supply all fuel, machinery / equipment
& technology to India for producing Nuclear Power.

(2) All these days from about 22 Nuclear Power Plants, India is
producing power as well as Atom. It's a high security / secret that
from where which is produced, how much is produced, where it is
supplied, what research is being done with that, etc. to anybody. But
if we sign this Agreement, we have to disclose these secrets and also
agree to 14 of our Nuclear Power Plants to be under the scanner of
International Atomic Power Organisation.

(3) The fuel utilised to produce Atomic Power can be recycled for reuse
and this plant will be under direct supervision of IAPO.

If India does nuclear test, this agreement gets cancelled. But

(1) USA will take back all the machinery / equipments / technology
supplied to India thus far.

(2) Those 14 plants will continue to be under scanner irrespective of
the status of the agreement.

On the other hand, if any of the commitments given by USA is breached by
them, then there is no clause for cancelling this agreement.

The agreement is apparently like this... USA can either hug India or
slap India. India will not ask why are we hugged or why are we slapped.

On the other hand, India cannot hug or slap USA for breach of agreement.

This is only capsule so that easy to read and digest.

Subject: India Pledged.... Part 2

Requirement of Power

The most important requirement for India's Economic Growth in the coming
years will be the power & infrastructure. The argument put forth
favouring the 123 Agreement says that we need Nuclear Power Production
to be increased to meet the demand.

Power Production in India

Presently following are the figures:

Thermal Power 66%

Hydel Power 26%

Solar & Wind Power 5% - Presently Rs.600 Crores are spent for producing
this power.

Nuclear Power 3% - If this is to be increased to 6%, it
requires additional Rs.50,000 Crores.

Naturally it will be wise to increase other 3 modes of power production
rather than the expensive & dangerous Nuclear Power. Isn't??

URANIUM

We used to import Uranium from various other countries. After the
Pokran Test, we are not getting it. To augment the supply, we need to
sign the 123 Agreement to get Uranium from USA. But we will have to
declare to USA from which power plant India takes raw material for
producing Atom Bomb. Why should we disclose our internal secrets to
those rascals ? Will any one allow an outsider to continuously monitor
what's happening in your Hall & Kitchen of your house? Other study
reveals that Uranium is available in India aplenty. Only hurdle is the
acquisition of land. To produce Atomic Power & Bomb in the next 40
years, the requirement of Uranium is 25,000 MT whereas the availability
is 78,000 MT across India.

PLUTONIUM

Presently 35% of Plutonium is used to produce Atomic Bombs. After
signing the Agreement, we will be allowed to use only 10%. Who are those
rascals to restrict the usage of our natural resource ? That is though
you are capable of cooking & eating 10 idlis as your breakfast, you are
allowed only 3 idlis henceforth. How can it be? Why should we accept
this?

THORIUM

As told by Dr.APJ, we have abundant Thorium. In fact we are the 2nd
largest producer of Thorium next only to Australia. India has to
explore this further for producing power. For your information, in
South India - particularly around Kanyakumari, the availability of
Thorium is abundant.

INDIA-IRAN-CHINA

USA does not like the amicable relationship between India-Iran and also
India-China. If India-China relationship gets stronger, then both these
can rule the Eastern Part of the Globe which USA wants to break as per
their divide & rule.

By signing this agreement, USA wants India to depend on it for producing
power which is going to be a crucial factor in future. There is a talk
of bringing Natural Gas from Iran to India with a big pipeline project.
USA doesn't like this proposal.

Atomic Power Technology

Whether power is produced or Bomb is produced, using Atomic power
without spoiling the infrastructure and without allowing the radiation
is always under threat. Moreover preserving the wastes coming out of
Atomic Power Plants is expensive & unsafe.

There was an accident in Three Miles Island in USA. To close this plant
nearly USD 200 Crores spent with tons & tons of concrete but yet to be
fully closed.

In an another accident at Soviet Union's Serbia Plant, even the next
generation child are affected due to the radiation.

It will be very very expensive to defuse & close down an Atomic Power
Plant than its construction cost.

France

France has got 56 Nuclear Power stations producing 73% of the country's
total power requirement. They are catching up the problem of
eliminating the wastes / emissions from out of those plants at the same
time increase the power production capacity. Government of France is
now thinking how to reduce the power consumption in the country.

Conclusion

In view of the above danger, rather than signing the agreement and
pledging India to USA, it will be prudent to increase the Solar & Wind
Energy and more importantly Hyder Power Production can be increased by
linking all rivers across India and by constructing DAMS. (Ofcourse Dam
construction projects can be given to L&T's B&F Sector:-)

The whole process of this Agreement started in the year 2005 when
Manmohan visited USA. In a span of just 2 years a major decision of
signing this agreement has taken place with political motive. On the
contrary, neither this Government nor any other earlier Central
Government could not amend the Constitution thereby nationalise the
rivers across the country thereby effectively utilise the water
resources for both Agriculture purpose and producing Hydel Power. What
an irony?

Whenever someone is helping the needy, you can't expect the TERMS AND
CONDITIONS BETWEEN THE needy and the helper to be EQUAL??? BUT

(1) the helper's ulterior motive should be seen with broad eye because
he is capable of digging a grave behind you and

(2) better to be self-sufficient and explore new avenues with available
resources.

INDIA-CHINA-USA

India is very rich in Culture, follow Religions, Value Ethics, Level of
Education is Very Good.

China is also rich in Culture, follow Religion, better disciplined.

USA does not have Culture, does not have Ethics, only want power over
others. Particularly wants a firm footing in South Asia. Remember the
introduction EURO by European Countries and it is stronger than Dollar?
So their "DAL" cannot be boiled at "EUROPE". They are trying in India
as already Pakistan is in their clutches.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "<<Aiii>> Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?" by Head Hunter
Head Hunter  
View profile
 More options Jul 18, 8:52 am
From: "Head Hunter" <kumars...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:22:26 +0530
Local: Fri, Jul 18 2008 8:52 am
Subject: Re: <<Aiii>> Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

kindly give us the exact text of the agreement...trust you leave the
conclusion part to us

--
"Every person I work with knows something better than me. My job is to
listen long enough to find it and use it."

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sanjeev  
View profile
 More options Jul 18, 12:38 pm
From: Sanjeev <sanjeev....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:08:49 +0530
Local: Fri, Jul 18 2008 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: <<Aiii>> Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

its a totally biased article, do u know that constucting a dam takes 15
years in india as every project faces as much as 10 petitions in court, than
high court than supreme court.
same way thermal power is not so cheap now with shortage of coal already
causing most of installed plants to run below capacity.
and last but not least.... this deal dont makes us dependent on USA. in fact
its just a moment that if AIEA gives go ahead to the draft agreement than
Russia and France will run up to do same deal with India even before USA.
in fact India will be able to sources reactors andd fuel from any country of
choice, not just USA.
article seems to be written by some CPM member, who thinks that producing
atom bombs is more important than producing power.

On 7/18/08, Akhil Jain <akhiljai...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "<<Aiii>> Re: Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?" by sudhir Agarwal
sudhir Agarwal  
View profile
 More options Jul 19, 9:44 pm
From: "sudhir Agarwal" <chuk...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:14:00 +0530
Subject: Re: <<Aiii>> Re: Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

This is a totally biased article.

Mr Akhil Jain must know that the increasing production via thermal power raises the chances of Global Warming. Even in USA they are aiming to switch to clean power in 10-15 years.

Ask any person living in UP & Bihar, they will tell how important electricity is for them.

This agreement is a must for INDIA.

USA is super power because of his economic progress which leads to ripple effect in other area.

USSR used to have all the atomic power yet it disintegrated.

Why we need Atomic Bomb in first place ???

If we can erradicate corruption, we will acquire more power than Atomic Bombs.

Sudhir Agarwal


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sanjay Chaturvedi  
View profile
 More options Jul 20, 2:22 am
From: "Sanjay Chaturvedi" <drsanjaychaturv...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:52:16 +0530
Local: Sun, Jul 20 2008 2:22 am
Subject: Re: <<Aiii>> Re: Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

http://meaindia.nic.in/cgi-bin/db2www/meaxpsite/coverpage.d2w/coverpg...
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/90157.pdf
you can find here from india and us source.

--
Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi
M.S., D.N.B.,M.N.A.M.S.
Asha Arthroscopy Center,
Prof. Champa Ram Chaturvedi Medical Complex
1/188 Delhi Gate,
Agra

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "<<Aiii>> Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?" by Salman Khan
Salman Khan  
View profile
 More options Jul 18, 7:29 am
From: "Salman Khan" <salmanspe...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:59:19 +0530
Local: Fri, Jul 18 2008 7:29 am
Subject: Re: <<Aiii>> Why is the India's nuclear deal with US pros and cons Benefits for India?

I have certain objections to the above article.They are as follows:-

a)The whole process of this Agreement started in the year 2005 when
Manmohan visited USA. In a span of just 2 years a major decision of
signing this agreement has taken place with political motive.

The seeds of present Indo US Nuclear deal were sown right at the time of
Atal Behari-Bill Clinton era when the then Deputy Chairman of the Planning
Commission (and External Affairs minister)  Jaswant Singh and US Deputy
Secretary of Sate Strobe Talbott held a series of talk in 1999. This is
something which is a common knowledge. Prospects of Indo US nuclear deal got
a major boost from a shift in geopolitics post 9/11.

People still can't understand why BJP is opposed to the Deal now. Maybe that
is what they call politics.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has just gone ahead with his predecessor's
policy with a view to clinch the deal. Manmohan Singh-Montek Singh Ahluwalia
team is very much concerned about the Energy security of India. We are quite
vulnerable when it comes to energy requirements. We import 75% of our crude
oil requirements. The current meltdown in Indian equity market can be
largely contributed to a sharp spike in International Crude oil Prices.

b) India is very rich in Culture, follow Religions, Value Ethics, Level of
Education is Very Good.

China is also rich in Culture, follow Religion, better disciplined.

USA does not have Culture, does not have Ethics, only want power over
others

This is yet another jingoistic stand which mars the Indian psyche. Rather
than appreciating the difference in the culture of two hemispheres or even
countries/social groups etc., we tend to glorify our own and denigrate
other's culture. The difference between "US" and "THEM" is always
overemphasised in our private talks.This in itself is the largest flaw in
our culture.

I agree, there are problems with Nuclear deal, but we need to raise the
technical points rather than juvenile arguments. Debates and discussions
should be concerned with weighing the positives and negatives rather than
resorting to mudslinging and personal attacks.

On 7/18/08, Akhil Jain <akhiljai...@gmail.com> wrote: